Asexual Advice

month

May 2012

28 posts

What is the difference between demisexual and low libido? I have heard people who are demi and people who have low libido describe their experiences, and it sounds the same to me (the differing factor being self-identification and self-understanding).

Mousy: Demisexuality refers to the sexual attraction that one experiences, which is not the same as libido.

Libido, or sex drive, refers to a physical desire for sex. People of any sexual orientation can have any level of libido.

For example, it is possible for an asexual person to have a high libido, which would mean that the person is not attracted to anyone but experiences the physical desire for sex. In this case, the desire is not directed towards anyone.

A person who has a low libido but is allosexual (not on the asexual spectrum) may well still experience attraction towards people, but not have the drive to engage in sexual activity.

In contrast, demisexuality refers to the experience of secondary but not primary sexual attraction, which means that one only experiences attraction after developing an emotional connection.

Note that this is not the same as “only having sex with someone after forming an emotional connection”.

Attraction and sex drive are only two amongst the many factors that can determine people’s decision to have sex (or not have sex). They may well lead to the same type of behaviour, but they are not the same thing.

May 28, 20124 notes
Hello there. Would you happen to know if it's normal or not to be unable to differentiate between the various types of love, lust aside? I am asexual and I think I may be aromantic as well, and I truly cannot tell the difference between platonic love and romantic love if there is no lust or sex involved. I'd be happy for any answers you'd be able to give me, because it makes me feel kind of weird. Thanks!

J.D. - I think I’m convinced that aromantics probably have the most trouble sorting this out. From what I’ve read and heard, it seems like it’s something that you just know and feel, or you don’t. From reading about romantic asexuals, it seems like romantic love is more about physical affection and dreamy-eyed sort of notions about your significant other. Platonic seems more like you want to know and understand the other person as much as possible, and you want to grow emotionally intimate in a way that isn’t just like your other friends. 

May 26, 20123 notes
Huh

I have a great friend. We have been really close for ages, and the other day she kissed me. I think you can guess that I have no interest in a romantic relationship with this person in any way. But, it took her a lot of courage to do that, because I am female as well. So, how can I make clear that I still want to be friends, but just friends, without making her feel like I am dismissing her because she is a lesbian?

J.D. - Tell her exactly what you’re telling us - if not in-person (if you can’t muster the courage to do it), write her a letter. She needs to hear/read it herself before things become a lot more difficult.

May 26, 20120 notes
Hey, Ace girl here. I have a very good friend who I think is also Ace - shes made her opinion on sex very clear since 6th grade - and I would love to talk to her more about asexuality, but I'm not sure how to start the discussion. Any advice?

Chris - You could wait for the subject to come up in regular conversation, or you could just casually mention it to her one day— “Hey, have you ever heard of asexuality?”— and go from there. Sorry I can’t be of more help than that, but I think the straightforward approach is best.

May 25, 20120 notes
#asexuality
A well meaning friend who understands I don't date (even if I never said the word asexual) said "you probably don't realise, but sometimes the way you act around the guys could be misinterpreted as flirting". Now I can't stop over thinking my every interaction with guy friends. In the past new acquaintances have occasionally misunderstood my friendship, so I must be doing something, but I can't see what it is. I don't act any differently with guys than with girls. What should I avoid doing?

Chris - A lot of people believe that it’s a blurry line between flirting and just being nice; for many, it’s difficult to tell the difference. Flirting, to the best of my limited knowledge, can include laughing at the other person’s jokes even if they’re bad, touching the other person more than is necessary, suggestive compliments, tone of voice, more eye contact than usual, being unnecessarily close to the other person, trading banter… things like that. If you want to avoid flirting, I’d say to mainly try to avoid too much eye contact, too much touching, and too much proximity. Also, avoid suggestive compliments because they can be misconstrued (she said, stating the obvious).

May 25, 20125 notes
#asexuality
When you have an asexual sort of crush, how can you tell? Does it feel different than strong platonic feelings?

Chris - Personally, I can definitely tell the difference between when I have strong platonic feelings for someone and when I have a crush on someone. For example, I have strong platonic feelings for my best friend, who is one of the most awesome people in the world, and who I am very lucky to know. When I like a guy, I also think he’s awesome, and I also think I’m lucky to know him. But it’s different because with a crush, there’s aesthetic and romantic attraction. I think he’s pretty, I get really nervous around him, I fall all over myself trying to make him happy, I jump at the chance to get a hug from him, I wish he’d ask me out, and so on and so forth. I don’t feel that way about my best friend, because with my best friend, the strong feelings are platonic. I hope that makes sense!

May 25, 20122 notes
#asexuality
Hi! :D I just saw someone's question about people telling them they're sexual when they say someone's hot and haha I would personally suggest saying someone's "not unpleasant to look at" as a way to get around it because generally it gets the message across in a very not-a-lot-of-room-for-reading-sexual-attraction-into-your-statement-of-aesthetic-appreciation way and if you say it in the right tone it can also make everyone laugh because it's so overly chaste in its phrasing :P haha :)
May 24, 20122 notes
If I tell my friends that someone is hot, later they'll use that as proof that I am sexual (not often. this is more from the general public). I think the breakdown in communication happens because they don't know exactly what I mean when I say hot. So what's a way to say I-find-them-aesthetically-pleasing-hot instead of I'd-tap-that-hot, without sounding ridiculous or pretentious? 'Cause right now both of those are a bit of a mouthful.

J.D. - I’ve no idea. Regardless of the semantics, I’m pretty sure they’re going to judge you and jump to certain conclusions because most people assume “attraction” still automatically implies some sort of sexual dimension. It really can’t be avoided. So I’d just continue saying people are hot (which is very “eye of the beholder” anyway) and who cares what they think.

Chris - So answering this is a little awkward because I haven’t answered a question here in ages (I’m really sorry!), but if it helps, I call people I find aesthetically attractive “pretty”, regardless of gender. I’m not really comfortable using the word “hot”, and I feel like “pretty” is a nice safe term to use.

May 24, 20123 notes
a book that has a great example of a family that is not sexual or romantic is "the bean trees" by barbara kingsolver. it's not asexual representation, per se, but has great examples of deep, non-"traditional" relationships.

J.D. - I’m not sure if this is a response to a previous question or not, but I did read this book when I was in high school. Unfortunately, I’ll just have to take your word for it, since all I really remember from the book was that the little girl’s name was Turtle. Haha.

May 22, 20121 note
i'm 18 and was recently kissed for the first time. it was honestly just kind of weird. i can't decide if this is because i'm somewhat asexual and so kissing just isn't for me, or because the situation was awkward and i was sort of taken off guard. the thing is, i do love hand holding and physical contact and am easily aroused, so i might be jumping to conclusions too fast based on a bungled first kiss. but i've also always felt pretty disconnected from the societal hype around sex. any advice?

J.D. - I don’t think you can really determine anything from just that kissing experience…you have to take into account all of the things together. Some asexuals appreciate physical contact more than others; some non-asexual people aren’t as physical either. It has to do more with who you are, deep down, and it takes a while to get there sometimes.

May 22, 20120 notes
Hey, would you ever think of setting up a forum or something for this place? I know there's AVEN but personally I find it's a bit daunting with the amount of people on there and this place seems more like a community and a place to get advice I feel comfortable using.. I kept finding that people on AVEN tended to be older than me and more experienced, which isn't a bad thing, but here it seems a lot of people share the same questions as me and I wish I could chat to them too.

J.D. - This is a nice idea in theory, however, Tumblr is probably the worst platform for this type of thing. The asexuality community on Livejournal is probably the best place for conversation and making new friends, in my opinion (and on the smaller scale like you’re looking for). This Tumblr is not nearly as active as it used to be either, with people coming and going all the time.

May 22, 20120 notes
Do you think it's possible to be attracted to the way someone looks or acts without it being sexual?

Emi-Definitely, it’s pretty normal to experience that kind of attraction, I believe the term might be aesthetic attraction though it could maybe be applied simply to looks. In any case, it’s completely possible.

May 21, 20124 notes
#Anonymous
To the recent anon asking about being aromantic, I've more often seen aromanticism defined as the lack of a desire for a romantic relationship than a lack of attraction full-stop. A lack of romantic attraction doesn't necessarily rule out aesthetic attraction. I don't think it means you're not aromantic if you sometimes find people aesthetically (or even sensually) attractive. (Though I see where identifying as, say, a biromantic aromantic doesn't work - perhaps biaesthetic? :p)
May 07, 20120 notes
#asexuality
To the person who asked if they can still be attracted to people but still be aromantic and asexual- I identify as aromantic and asexual and am attracted to both men and women. To me, it's mostly aesthetic attraction- I can find a person very attractive looking and if they have a good personality on top of that, even better- but I never have any desire to have any kind of sexual or romantic relations with them.
May 07, 20121 note
#asexuality
As a general query, are there those of you (the mods) that are on more often than others?

J.D. - There are a lot mods who basically just up and vanished. Some of them are on Tumblr still, but don’t really help out with this blog anymore. It’s mostly just me, unfortunately, and a few others who pop in on occasion. I was thinking about maybe inviting more people on again who want to volunteer to help answer some questions. There was a time when we actually answered ALL OF THE QUESTIONS in our inbox, believe it or not!

Southpaw/Becca - I do apologize about this- I’m a graduate student and it’s currently finals, so I’ve been otherwise occupied. But hopefully once the semester ends, I’ll be able to return to answering questions more regularly.

Chris - I’m sorry about this, too.

May 07, 20120 notes
Can I be attracted to both men and women, more so women and still be asexual and aromantic?

J.D. - I’m not so sure. I guess it depends on the nature of the attraction? From my experience though, aromantic asexuals usually aren’t attracted to people…in general. That’s what sets them apart from everyone else. That’s not to say that you HAVE to be on the extreme end of things, of course.

May 07, 20120 notes
i'm very, very asexual. aromantic as well. i really do not want to be. is there anything i can do to change it? i don't have any hormone imbalances, no traumatic history, i'm not "insecure" about sex or even sex repulsed, etc, but i just cannot make myself attracted to anyone. i don't think there's anything wrong with asexuality in other people, i just don't want to be this way. how would i go about getting help?

J.D. - You will only make yourself more unhappy by trying to be someone you’re not. You cannot force yourself to be attracted to people. I’ve tried that, and it never ends well. The kind of help you’re looking for doesn’t have to do with your sexual orientation, but your psychology and the way you’re thinking about yourself. You way want to seek help in regards to that instead. Good luck.

May 06, 20122 notes
I have zero desire for sex. I really don't want to have it ever. However, I am attracted to the opposite sex and not against the idea of having a romantic relationship, with the extent of "sexual" contact being hugs and short kisses. I know that opinions tend to vary on the exact definition of asexuality, so I'm just wondering if you would consider me to be asexual? (Sorry if this question or similar questions have been asked before, I'm just rather curious about the opinions of other asexuals).

J.D. - It’s possible that you’re heteroromantic.

May 06, 20120 notes
For the anon whose parents asked when they'll get grandchildren - desire to have kids (bio or adoption) doesn't match up with sexual attraction and/or having a partner, so it's not totally out of the question, necessarily. Though it sounds like the anon isn't interested in having kids, so there we are.

J.D. - Well, yes, but I was under the assumption that the anon wasn’t interested in any of that, hence the question.

May 06, 20120 notes
If one, every once in a blue moon, strongly desires cuddles or occasionally has a strong urge to hug an aesthetically pleasing celebrity, can they still be considered aromantic?

J.D. - Sure, why not. Only you can truly gauge these things, and sometimes things can be kind of blurry and not so definite.

May 06, 20121 note
Next page →
2012 2013
  • January 15
  • February 301
  • March 81
  • April 107
  • May 143
  • June 64
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
2011 2012 2013
  • January 49
  • February 26
  • March 24
  • April 42
  • May 28
  • June 31
  • July 12
  • August 64
  • September 12
  • October 28
  • November 37
  • December 10
2010 2011 2012
  • January 31
  • February 31
  • March 34
  • April 32
  • May 26
  • June 34
  • July 17
  • August 27
  • September 28
  • October 44
  • November 9
  • December 13
2010 2011
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August 28
  • September 35
  • October 37
  • November 37
  • December 80